Indiana prosecuting attorneys oppose House Joint Resolution No. 1, expanding impeachment of prosecutors

Submitted

Editor’s note: The following op-ed was released to The Reporter on Tuesday, Jan. 6. It was written and approved by numerous county prosecutors across the state.

Indiana’s elected prosecutors stand united in opposition to legislative proposals that would strip constitutional authority from duly elected prosecutors.

Representative Andrew Ireland has chosen to focus attacks on so-called “rogue prosecutors,” suggesting that the challenges facing our criminal justice system stem from an individual prosecutor exercising prosecutorial discretion. These attacks oversimplify complex, systemic issues, and mislead the public. Public safety is a shared responsibility and will not be improved by eliminating prosecutorial discretion or impeaching elected prosecutors.

We are grateful for the attention the General Assembly is paying to strengthened public safety policy, and we outline below a handful of steps the legislature can take during this session.

First, the legislature should expand mandatory minimum executed sentences to include all violent crimes such as strangulation and rape and child molesting as level 3 felonies. The justice system’s first obligation is to ensure accountability for those who choose to commit acts of violence. While Indiana has many strong judges dedicated to public safety, recent trends show that some judges do not approach violent crime with the seriousness it demands. In some cases, judges have imposed sentences that fail to reflect the severity of the crime, undermine deterrence, and erode public confidence in the justice system.

Expanded mandatory minimum sentences for all violent offenses serve as a safeguard against this inconsistency. Victims and law enforcement should not be left to wonder whether a dangerous offender will receive a slap on the wrist or a punishment that truly matches their crime. Mandatory minimums for violent crimes ensure that regardless of the personal philosophies of individual judges, these crimes will always result in meaningful punishment, and they create uniformity, predictability, and accountability in our justice system.

Second, we ask the legislature to continue to support preventive detention and pass a resolution as it did with Senate Joint Resolution No. 1 during the 2023 Session. Currently, Indiana law provides that all offenders are entitled to post bonds, regardless of their crimes or criminal history, with the limited exception of those charged with murder or treason. Far too often, violent offenders are released on their own recognizance, or with a low bond by judges, putting communities at further risk. Preventive detention will allow the justice system to hold violent offenders without bond pending trial when clear threats to public safety exist, a necessary step to restore confidence in our justice system and protect innocent citizens.

Third, we ask the legislature to help prosecutors hold violent juveniles accountable by restoring direct filing of certain adult charges. Juveniles illegally carrying handguns has undermined community safety. Currently, these offenses cannot be directly filed as adult charges, and as a result, the most dangerous juvenile offenders are emboldened as the law does not hold them fully accountable. Juvenile gun violence is not a theoretical problem; it is a daily reality in our communities. Armed, violent juvenile offenders should be treated as adults because when judges keep these cases in juvenile court it sends the wrong message to both the offenders and to victims.

Fourth, we request the legislature expand “truth in sentencing.”  Too many convicted felons receive time cuts that dramatically reduce their sentences because of the way the Indiana Department of Correction has operated and doled out Case Plan Credit Time. We ask the legislature to remove or severely limit the DOC’s discretion in handing out credit time without rehabilitation, education, or other earned efforts. For example, the DOC has given out significant time cuts for activities such as journaling or other insignificant aspects of a case plan. The Case Plan Credit Time program has resulted in numerous convicted felons receiving up to two actual years off their sentences. Time cuts should only be granted when an offender has made meaningful efforts toward rehabilitation. We ask the legislature to rein in these practices that make the Indiana Department of Corrections a revolving door for violent offenders.

Fifth and finally, prosecutors must be provided proper funding to do our jobs, and we ask the legislature to help us do so. The prosecutor, in everything the prosecutor does, enforces state law.  A prosecutor is not answerable to county authorities, nor does a prosecutor exercise county power.  The prosecutor’s only connection with the county (or counties) in the prosecutor’s circuit is that the county funds the operation of the office.  Prosecutors in all communities across our state are asking for a lifeline from the legislature to help provide the resources necessary to effectively fight crime.

A recent study shows that Indiana’s prosecutors are roughly 385 attorneys short of what is required to effectively prosecute crime. The clear evidence of severe staffing shortages that strain our ability to handle growing caseloads and continually expanding discovery call out for solutions. Specifically, prosecutors are asking the legislature to raise court costs to help provide funding necessary to fill vacant positions and attract qualified deputy prosecutors. Providing additional funding for prosecutors’ offices will move the needle on tackling violent crime.

Indiana’s prosecutors remain committed to protecting our communities and ensuring justice for victims. But we cannot do it alone. We look forward to partnering with the Indiana General Assembly and ask for help to invest in the staffing and resources prosecutors need and enact effective laws and sanctions to effectively combat crime.

Signed by the following Indiana Prosecutors:

Jeremy Brown
26th Judicial Circuit, Adams County

Michael J. McAlexander
38th Judicial Circuit, Allen County

Lindsey Holden-Kay
9th Judicial Circuit, Bartholomew County

Joelle A. Freiburger
71st Judicial Circuit, Blackford County

Kent T. Eastwood
20th Judicial Circuit, Boone County

Theodore F. Adams
88th Judicial Circuit, Brown County

Nicholas C. McLeland
74th Judicial Circuit, Carroll County

Noah S. Schafer
29th Judicial Circuit, Cass County

Jeremy T. Mull
4th Judicial Circuit, Clark County

Emily Bookwalter Clarke
13th Judicial Circuit, Clay County

Anthony J. Sommer
45th Judicial Circuit, Clinton County

Abby J.M. Brown

49th Judicial Circuit, Daviess County

Lynn Marie Deddens
7th Judicial Circuit, Dearborn/Ohio Counties

Nathan W. Harter IV
69th Judicial Circuit, Decatur County

Neal R. Blythe
75th Judicial Circuit, DeKalb County

Eric Hoffman
46th Judicial Circuit, Delaware County

Vicki E. Becker
34th Judicial Circuit, Elkhart County

Betty Jo Jones
73rd Judicial Circuit, Fayette County

Chris Lane
52nd Judicial Circuit, Floyd County

Daniel L. Askren
61st Judicial Circuit, Fountain County

Christopher D. Huerkamp
37th Judicial Circuit, Franklin County

Michael T. Marrs
41st Judicial Circuit, Fulton County

Michael R. Cochren
66th Judicial Circuit, Gibson County

Scott J. Hunt
48th Judicial Circuit, Grant County

Jarrod D. Holtsclaw
63rd Judicial Circuit, Greene County

  1. Gregory Garrison (retired)
    24th Judicial Circuit, Hamilton County

Josh Kocher
24th Judicial Circuit, Hamilton County

Brent E. Eaton
18th Judicial Circuit, Hancock County

Michael J. Mahoney
53rd Judicial Circuit, Henry County

Mark A. McCann
62rd Judicial Circuit, Howard County

Jeremy K. Nix
56th Judicial Circuit, Huntington County

Jacob R. Taulman
30th Judicial Circuit, Jasper County

Wesley A. Schemenaur
58th Judicial Circuit, Jay County

David R. Sutter
5th Judicial Circuit, Jefferson County

Lance Hamner
8th Judicial Circuit, Johnson County

  1. Dirk Carnahan
    12th Judicial Circuit, Knox County
  2. Brad Voelz
    54th Judicial Circuit, Kosciusko County

Travis Glick
35th Judicial Circuit, LaGrange County

Bernard A. Carter
31st Judicial Circuit, Lake County

Sean P. Fagan
32nd Judicial Circuit, LaPorte County

Samual C. Arp, II
81st Judicial Circuit, Lawrence County

Rodney J. Cummings
50th Judicial Circuit, Madison County

Aureola S. Vincz
90th Judicial Circuit, Martin County

Jeffrey K. Sinkovics
51st Judicial Circuit, Miami County

Erika L. Oliphant
10th Judicial Circuit, Monroe County

Joseph R. Buser
22nd Judicial Circuit, Montgomery County

Steven P. Sonnega
15th Judicial Circuit, Morgan County

Holly N. Hudelson
87th Judicial Circuit, Orange County

Benjamin C. Kim
78th Judicial Circuit, Owen County

Samantha K. Hurst
70th Judicial Circuit, Perry County

Gary S. Germann
67th Judicial Circuit, Porter County

Thomas E. Clowers
11th Judicial Circuit, Posey County

Kelly M. Gaumer
59th Judicial Circuit, Pulaski County

Austin Malayer
64th Judicial Circuit, Putnam County

Philip J. Caviness
65th Judicial Circuit, Rush County

Kenneth P. Cotter
60th Judicial Circuit, St. Joseph County

Chris A. Owens
6th Judicial Circuit, Scott County

Brad B. Landwerlen
16th Judicial Circuit, Shelby County

Megan L. Bennet
84th Judicial Circuit, Spencer County

Travis B. Musser
85th Judicial Circuit, Steuben County

Ann Smith Mischler
14th Judicial Circuit, Sullivan County

Ryan Marshall
91st Judicial Circuit, Switzerland County

Patrick K. Harrington
23rd Judicial Circuit, Tippecanoe County

Jay Rich
36th Judicial Circuit, Tipton County

Andrew “A.J.” Bryson
89th Judicial Circuit, Union County

Diana L. Moers
1st Judicial Circuit, Vanderburgh County

Bruce D. Aukerman
47th Judicial Circuit, Vermillion County

William C. Hartley Jr.
27th Judicial Circuit, Wabash

Tara Coats Hunt
42nd Judicial Circuit, Washington County

Michael W. Shipman
17th Judicial Circuit, Wayne County

Mark Delgado
39th Judicial Circuit, White County

D.J. Sigler, Jr.
82nd Judicial Circuit, Whitley County