Who gets picked to serve on a City of Fishers board or commission? Not you

By JOCELYN VARE
Guest Columnist

If you are the kind of person who wants to get involved with city government or community volunteer work, a city board or commission should be the perfect on-ramp.

The City of Fishers website reads: “Fishers boards and commissions are a great way for citizens to get involved with their local community. These groups provide input and direction for the council on decisions that can impact Fishers for years to come. This participation from our residents is essential to maintaining our status as one of this country’s best places to live.”

In reality, citizen applications are not reviewed or even acknowledged. Appointments to city boards and commissions in Fishers are made behind closed doors and current appointments are just blindly renewed for another term. If you are one of the dozens of citizens who applied, you are not being considered.

Graphic provided by Jocelyn Vare

Back in January 2021, I demonstrated to the City Council that this problem needed to be fixed. I reviewed the makeup of all the Fishers boards and commissions at that time and found an egregious lack of diversity. For example, only 20 percent of all appointments are women. Since these appointments lack transparency and fail to consider citizen applications, there is zero opportunity for more women to serve. New ideas will never enter the room if seats at the table are only offered to the people currently sitting in them.

At that time, 47 citizen applications were received. Forty-seven people wanted to serve. None were considered. The city did not recruit citizens to apply. In short, the City Council’s Republican majority did not want new citizens participating in these boards and commissions.

How did the City Council majority respond when I flagged this concern and made a recommendation to evaluate current appointees and open up future appointments? They said absolutely nothing.

Our community’s local news blogger, Larry in Fishers, commented on this after my remarks at the January 2021 meeting. He said, “It concerns me that city council appointments to boards and commissions fail to reflect that diversity of today’s Fishers.”

A year later, a taskforce of selected city councilors was created to evaluate all city committees and consider creating a new Rules Committee. The taskforce’s efforts were commandeered by the Republican majority. They recommended giving full authority to one person, the City Council President, to independently make all the appointments to boards and commissions. Thankfully, that proposal was defeated.

The Indianapolis Star reported, “A proposal to give the Fishers City Council president final say on appointments to boards and commissions ran into resistance this week by (the two Democrat) councilors who said it was secretive, unnecessary and fails to increase diversity on the citizen panels.”

Finally, in January 2022, a Fishers City Council standing Rules Committee was formed. The purpose of the new Rules Committee is to recommend the appointments to city boards and commissions. Finally, a transparent and formalized appointment process would be created!

Not so fast. Although created in January, the committee didn’t conduct its first meeting until December. When the committee met for the first time to consider the 2023 appointments to city boards and commission, the Rules Committee meeting lasted only five minutes!

The Rules Committee approved a draft of 2023 appointments to city boards and commissions at its Dec. 15, 2022, meeting. The city attorney prepared that draft and the committee approved it as presented. Each of the appointments in the draft was a renewal of the current appointee.

No new appointees were considered. Many applications were submitted by citizens this year who wanted to be considered for these appointments, even though the city did not promote this opportunity. These applications were not reviewed by the committee at its meeting.

Who in our community gets picked to serve on a City of Fishers board or commission? Not you.

Not unless you already serve on a board or commission. And that can really explain why there is a lack of diversity in these appointments again. This is unacceptable.

I have directed chairperson Selina Stoller to reconvene the Rules Committee, fix the errors on the appointment recommendations, consider all the new applications and review the current roster of appointees. In addition, I offered this example of a best practice for Fishers to adopt. A City of South Bend ordinance includes simple procedures for appointing citizens to city boards and commission. These new procedures would be a big improvement in transparency for Fishers.

In conclusion, the City of Fishers is the sixth-largest city in the state. We are looked upon as a leader, one of the few bright spots in Indiana. Our city government practices here should be precise, transparent, and thoughtful. It’s not hard.

It is clear from this two-year-long journey that the current city administration and majority of the city council do not take the responsibility board and commission appointments seriously. The Republican majority is determined to control these appointments and have no concern about a lack of transparency. They are not serving the entire community. They are serving themselves and hope you don’t notice.

Thankfully, the appointments do not have to be finalized until Jan. 17, 2023. There’s still time to do it right. And, it requires more than a five-minute meeting for the Rules Committee to fulfill its responsibility.

Fishers residents, if you’d like to be considered for an appointment to the City of Fishers board or commission, please complete the online application. We must try to make our city better and better represent the people who live here. I’m here, fighting for this with you.

Jocelyn Vare currently serves as the first Democrat elected by the city of Fishers and was a candidate for State Senate District 31 in 2022. Learn more at JocelynVareForFishers.com.

2 Comments on "Who gets picked to serve on a City of Fishers board or commission? Not you"

  1. If you feel as strongly as you state about the matter – why the reluctance to name the obstructionists ?
    You wrote the above column to presumably shine a light on what you feel is an injustice, readers will connect or possibly engage with the premise of actual people being whats holding things back far more than holding up the ‘rules committee’ as the bad actor.
    Leadership requires courage on occasion . Demonstrate some.

  2. As stated in the above letter ; “it’s not hard ”
    Noted ; all members voted ‘yay’ .. including your fellow Democrat Crystal Neumann.

    1. Meeting Called to Order
    The meeting was called to order at 9:00 a.m. by Selina Stoller. Present were John
    Weingardt, Cecilia Coble, Crystal Neumann and City Clerk Jennifer Kehl.

    2. A Request to Approve 2023 Council Appointments for Non-Standing Council Committees.
    John Weingardt made a motion to approve the committee recommendations. Cecilia Coble seconded the motion. There was no remonstrance and all members voted yay. The motion passed.

    3. Meeting Adjournment
    John Weingardt made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Crystal Neumann seconded the motion. There was no remonstrance and all members voted yay. The motion passed.
    The meeting was adjourned at 9:05 a.m.

Comments are closed.