Submitted
Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill on Friday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to affirm the constitutionality of Indiana’s law requiring parental notice when minors obtain abortions.
The law at issue applies to minors who already have obtained an exemption from a juvenile court allowing them to proceed with an abortion without parental permission as typically required under Indiana law. The law requires parental notice except for when a juvenile court rules that notifying parents is not in the minor’s best interests, such as when the child lives with abusive family members.
A three-judge panel of the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has previously upheld a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of Indiana’s parental notice law. That court then declined Indiana’s petition for a rehearing of the matter by the full court.
One Seventh Circuit judge stated that a rehearing would be pointless because only the U.S. Supreme court at this stage can adequately clarify how its own precedents apply to abortion regulations such as Indiana’s law.
“It is better to send this dispute on its way to the only institution that can give an authoritative answer,” wrote Judge Frank Easterbrook.
The appellate court’s difficulty making sense of the tangled web of case law is telling, Hill said.
Hill
“When even the most experienced and distinguished members of the federal judiciary throw up their hands in confused frustration,” Hill said, “it is time for our nation’s highest court to issue guidance.”
A look back to America’s founding documents should bode well for Indiana’s law, Hill added.
“Nothing in the U.S. Constitution prohibits Indiana from requiring parental notification when an unemancipated minor is getting an abortion,” Hill said. “Even to get a tattoo, a minor in Indiana needs parental permission. Quite simply, parents have rights and responsibilities in the care and upbringing of a child.”
Further, on a practical level, Indiana’s law helps protect the child’s own well-being, Hill added.
“An abortion is a medical procedure that could have implications for a child’s future treatment,” Hill said. “It’s an event that could bear on a child’s emotional needs and mental health, and it’s an event that parents need to know about in order to provide nurturing care and guidance.”
Click here to read Indiana’s petition to the Supreme Court.